The Importance of Setting Boundaries For Humans and Agents
The answers start with familiar security principles, particularly identity.
That becomes more complex in an agentic organization, which must distinguish among the employee initiating an action, the agent performing it and the systems being accessed. We also need to think carefully about delegation.
It’s vital, though, because (again, just as with humans) an agent should have access only to the systems, data and actions necessary for its job. That chain of accountability needs to be visible.
Not every action requires human approval. Scheduling a meeting is different from approving a purchase or changing a customer record. Organizations need clear thresholds that determine when a human stays in the loop.
But human oversight doesn’t mean approving every AI decision. If we put a person in front of every action, we’ve simply recreated the manual process we wanted AI to eliminate. An agent should be able to operate within defined boundaries and escalate when it encounters an exception, reaches a risk threshold or faces a decision that requires human judgment.
IT teams also need visibility into what agents are doing — not just what systems they access, but what they attempt, what decisions they make and whether their behavior remains within policy.
DIVE DEEPER: Learn what you’ll need to build a foundation for scalable artificial intelligence.
Keeping Humans In the Loop With Agentic AI
Ultimately, humans need to become stewards of AI. The steward understands what an agent is supposed to accomplish, what boundaries it operates within and whether its behavior and outcomes make sense. The steward steps in when an agent encounters an exception, reaches a predefined threshold or produces an unexpected result.
An AI steward doesn’t need to watch an agent every second. We don’t want people micromanaging autonomous systems. We want them positioned to make the decisions that actually require human judgment.
That could mean reviewing an agent’s performance, changing its permissions as circumstances evolve or deciding that a particular process should no longer be automated. It also means someone must have the authority to pause or shut down an agent when it behaves outside expectations.
Humans won’t compete with agents on speed or volume.
Our value will increasingly come from judgment, context and accountability — knowing when the rules don’t tell the whole story. The goal isn’t to keep AI from acting on our behalf. It’s to make sure we understand the authority we’re giving it and have the right human structure around that authority.
