Technical debt can be an issue for any organization, whether it’s a large enterprise, a small business or a nonprofit.
While smaller organizations may face challenges in addressing technical debt due to a lack of in-house IT expertise or staffing, that doesn’t mean they should completely sidestep the issue. Letting technical debt accumulate can worsen security and operational risks.
“Technical debt is a systemic issue, not just a one-off hardware or software reaching end of life problem,” says Bhaskar Jayakrishnan, senior vice president of engineering for customer experience at Cisco. “Because the entire system is interconnected, an unpatched OS or a legacy software integration at the edge of your network provides an entry point that can be used to move laterally and escalate privileges toward your most sensitive data.”
For nonprofits that use Android devices, for instance, will want to review their environments, since Android 10 and 11 reached end of life recently. It’s not just about unsupported smartphones: Android may power warehouse scanners, kiosks, tablets or an organization’s frontline mobility fleets.
Click the banner below to learn more about elevating your organization's workspace.
Here’s how nonprofit organizations can re-evaluate their environments to reduce technical debt with a clear plan.
Don’t Allow Technical Debt To Become a Liability
When operating systems and app updates cease, security gaps can become wide open as a “front door” for adversaries to waltz through, Jayakrishnan notes.
READ MORE: The guide to an essential tech stack nonprofits need to scale any giving program.
“In a modern threat landscape, attackers do not just target the core database; they exploit the weakest link at the periphery. An unpatched mobile device or an outdated field-reporting app provides the initial access needed to launch complex, multistage attack chains,” he says. “Once an attacker gains a foothold, they use these stale systems to navigate the environment, escalate privileges, and eventually reach critical assets.”
For nonprofits with lean or nonexistent IT teams, Jayakrishnan recommends a structured strategy with three phases:
- Visibility and Stabilization – Develop an inventory that covers hardware, software versions and the interdependencies between them. Identify every peripheral device and application that connects to the network, because these are the primary targets for initial access.
- Strategic Alignment – Categorize assets based on their operational impact and risk profile.
- For systems that cannot be secured: These must be prioritized for immediate replacement.
- For systems that must be kept in use (the “extended” category): Apply compensating controls to mitigate risk. This means isolating these systems through network segmentation, applying controls at the network level or restricting their access to only the specific data and users required for their function. This “sandboxing” prevents a vulnerable device or software application from becoming a bridge for lateral movement. It is important to note that while these controls significantly reduce the probability of a successful exploit, they do not eliminate the risk entirely. The only way to fully remove the threat is eventual replacement.
- Proactive Lifecycle Management – Build a staggered refresh plan. This methodically hardens the entire ecosystem, reducing the attack surface over time without requiring a massive, one-time budget outlay.
“The difference between a reactive organization and a proactive one is the presence of a unified lifecycle calendar,” Jayakrishnan adds.
How a Strategic Partner Can Help
A technology partner can provide the visibility that many nonprofits may not have, augmenting teams and acting as an extension that can monitor the environment holistically.
“By identifying components approaching end of support 18 months in advance, a partner helps you build a roadmap that aligns with your mission and budget,” Jayakrishnan says. “This shifts the focus from firefighting to environmental hygiene, ensuring that your entire infrastructure remains a resilient, secure foundation rather than a hidden source of volatility.”
DISCOVER: What’s the best Way for nonprofits to migrate to the cloud?
He calls technical debt a “hidden tax on mission delivery.” And while nonprofits may watch their budgets closely, the cost of a breach can include so much more than just a potential ransom: the loss of donor trust, regulatory exposure and the operational disruption of recovery.
Jayakrishnan adds that the “soft” costs of inefficient workflows include staff struggling with slow systems, broken integrations and manual workarounds. “By moving to a structured, staggered refresh cycle, organizations can convert the unpredictable risk of a crisis into a manageable, visible investment. This provides the financial discipline necessary to keep the entire organization secure, efficient and focused on its core mission,” he says.
