Hyperautomation vs. Robotic Process Automation
Hyperautomation reflects a step beyond the more common approach of robotic process automation, which focuses on shifting tedious tasks to software-based tools as a strategy to automate large portions of the business and IT infrastructure.
This approach to RPA has its place, but it is more tactical and less use-case driven, Burke says.
Amit Saxena, vice president and general manager of Automation Engine for ServiceNow, says that, from a technical perspective, hyperautomation distinguishes itself from alternative approaches like Integration Platforms as a Service by taking a more holistic approach to automating tasks.
“So what is now happening, which analysts have started picking up on, is the convergence of these technologies into a single platform, a set of tools our customers can use,” Saxena explains. “And that’s easier said than done because these tools have different degrees of maturity. How do you actually bring it all together?”
To put it another way, hyperautomation often encourages the use of a centralized platform to deliver the benefits of an automated process organizationally.
RELATED: Learn how ServiceNow can help deliver a better customer experience.
Hyperautomation Implementation: The Roles Tools and Software Play
From a technology perspective, hyperautomation casts a broad net, incorporating capabilities from several technology disciplines. One of those tools is RPA, which can be implemented as one element of a hyperautomation discipline.
As businesses implement hyperautomation, Burke says, “they’re going to look across information about processes or they’re going to watch what people do while they’re working day in and day out, and say, ‘Hey, I’ve got something that we can automate. And here’s the audition for it. Test this, make sure it works. You can use it.’”
Other tools that can come in handy within hyperautomation include low-code or no-code tools and technologies with direct application programming interfaces and command-line access. A strong discipline for high programming standards is important as well, Burke says, as are guardrails for given systems to protect security.
While there are many techniques to work into a hyperautomation discipline, the challenge is that not every department needs the same kind of automation, which often means that one type of technology may not solve a problem. ServiceNow’s Saxena notes that this is often a driving factor behind more tactical automation implementation.
“The problem of islands of automation is something real; this needs to be fixed,” Saxena says. “ServiceNow has done our part by providing one platform, one data model, one architecture, for all of our customers’ automation needs, because it’s not a one-size-fits-all approach.”
READ MORE: Find out how automation can accelerate digital transformation.
Saxena suggests that building an approach to hyperautomation that works on a single platform but allows for different use cases under the same implementation can benefit companies because different teams can share what they’ve learned on a single platform rather than on a wide array of tools.
“That’s the difference, and that allows them to have a higher productivity level,” he said. “Because it’s not like four different technology stacks for every single automation, and then you’re just figuring it out.”
Hyperautomation Implementation: The Role Culture Plays
Because hyperautomation reflects a higher level of thinking about automation, it requires, in some ways, a people-centric approach to ensure its success. Nemertes’s Burke explains that automation is most successful when it is tied to an organization’s culture.
“You’ve got to foster a culture of automation if you want to get hyperautomation because you’re basically saying, ‘Hey, let’s get the software to do more of your work,’” he says.
The challenge is that not every employee will appreciate that shift.
“There are some folks who say, ‘Yay, this part of my work is boring. Let’s get it off my plate,’” Burke says. “And then there are folks who say, ‘Hey, that’s what I get paid for. If I automate, what am I going to do?’ That’s a cultural and a management issue.”
Leadership may be an easier sell on extending automation, according to ServiceNow’s Saxena, in part because “it’s already top of mind in the C-suite.”