Jun 24 2026
Cloud

Q&A: IBM Expert on How Financial Institutions Can Control Cloud Costs With FinOps Practices

Artificial intelligence is a new and less-governed area of cloud consumption where a FinOps approach can make a difference.

While cloud migration and optimization aren’t new, the rising interest in artificial intelligence, and the impact of it on cloud spending, is requiring organizations to reconsider their approach in the cloud.

Cloud spending is no longer just an IT concern, it’s a governance, risk and financial planning issue. For financial services organizations that manage millions of payments, trading transactions and ATM activities, small inefficiencies can have a major impact on overall cloud costs.

Applying a FinOps approach to financial institutions’ cloud management strategy can help reduce costs and create architectural efficiencies.

BizTech spoke with James Stevenson, client partner and cloud and technology strategy global practice and offering leader at IBM Consulting, about the current cloud spending landscape for financial institutions and how a FinOps approach can better position organizations to optimize their cloud usage in an AI world.

EXPLORE: Why is FinOps success more important than ever?

BIZTECH: Why have cloud costs become such a pressing issue for financial services institutions?

STEVENSON: Cloud costs have become a pressing issue for financial services firms because cloud has moved from being a transformation enabler to a material operating cost. Financial institutions accelerated cloud adoption to improve agility, speed and innovation while supporting increasingly data-intensive capabilities such as AI, analytics and digital customer services. As that adoption has matured, cloud is no longer a marginal IT expense — in many cases, it is now a major cost driver.

Several factors contribute to this pressure: multicloud complexity, rapid experimentation, inconsistent governance, low-cost visibility across business units and the challenge of linking consumption to business value. In today’s economic environment, firms are under greater pressure to understand cloud unit economics and ensure spend is aligned to measurable business outcomes.

BIZTECH: What are the impacts of high cloud costs on a financial organization?

STEVENSON: High cloud costs can materially affect a financial institution’s ability to invest, operate efficiently and compete. In many firms, cloud spend is shifting from “change the bank” budgets that fund transformation into “run the bank” operating costs. When that happens without sufficient governance, cloud can start to erode the funding available for innovation, modernization and customer-facing differentiation.

The impact is not just financial. Poorly managed cloud spend can reduce forecasting accuracy, create tension between finance and engineering teams, and limit leadership’s ability to make informed investment decisions. For financial services firms operating in a highly competitive and regulated environment, uncontrolled cloud costs can become a barrier to growth, resilience and innovation.

Click the banner below to read the recent CDW Cloud Computing Research Report.

 

BIZTECH: Where do you most often see waste or overspending in financial institutions’ cloud environments?

STEVENSON: In financial services, many of the early and obvious cloud inefficiencies have already been addressed, particularly by firms that were early adopters. Today, we most often see overspending in newer or less-governed areas of consumption.

One common area is AI and advanced analytics, where many firms are still in experimentation mode and governance has not fully caught up with usage. Another is legacy applications that were migrated to cloud without being fully redesigned for cloud-native architectures, which often leads to overprovisioning or inefficient use of services. We also commonly see waste in storage tiering, idle or underutilized resources, inconsistent tagging, and fragmented purchasing or reservation strategies across business units.

The pattern is less about a lack of cloud adoption and more about the need for more mature governance, architecture discipline and accountability at scale.

BIZTECH: What is FinOps and what does it entail?

STEVENSON: FinOps is a cloud financial management discipline that helps organizations maximize the business value of cloud by bringing together finance, technology and business teams to make better, data-driven decisions. It is both an operating model and a cultural practice focused on improving visibility, accountability, forecasting, optimization and governance across cloud consumption.

Importantly, FinOps is not simply about reducing spend. It is about helping organizations make intentional trade-offs between cost, speed and performance so they can invest more effectively and scale cloud responsibly.

At IBM, we increasingly see FinOps working alongside technology business management, or TBM. TBM complements FinOps by extending the conversation beyond cloud cost into broader technology cost, value and business alignment. Together, FinOps and TBM help organizations understand not only what cloud costs but what value it delivers in the context of products, services and customer journeys — for example, mortgage servicing, payments processing or ATM transactions. That combination gives financial institutions a stronger foundation for investment planning and value realization.

LEARN MORE: How do CDW and IBM elevate IT finance management beyond the balance sheet?

BIZTECH: How can FinOps help financial services organizations bring down cloud costs?

STEVENSON: FinOps helps financial services organizations reduce cloud costs by creating transparency, accountability and consistency across complex cloud environments. In large financial institutions, different business units often have different consumption patterns, priorities and technology stacks. A mature FinOps model establishes common governance, standard metrics and shared workflows so those teams can operate with a consistent view of cloud usage and value.

That consistency enables better benchmarking across business units, more accurate forecasting and faster identification of inefficiencies. It also helps firms shift from reactive cost management to proactive cost engineering. For example, leading institutions are embedding cost policies directly into engineering workflows — guiding teams toward appropriate service choices, storage tiers and architectural patterns before spending occurs. This FinOps as Code approach helps reduce waste at the source rather than after the fact.

For financial services institutions, that means lower cloud waste, stronger financial discipline, and better alignment between cloud investments and business priorities.

BIZTECH: How should financial institutions approach the creation of a FinOps strategy that will serve them now and in the future?

STEVENSON: Financial institutions should approach FinOps strategically, not just as a tooling initiative. The most effective FinOps strategies are built on four foundations: data and tooling, governance, operating model and cross-functional accountability.

Tooling is essential, but tools alone do not create outcomes. Firms also need clear processes, decision rights, policies and roles that define how cloud spending is governed and optimized. Just as important, FinOps must be supported jointly by finance, technology, engineering and business leadership. It is not a siloed capability; it requires enterprisewide sponsorship and participation.

Future-ready firms are also moving upstream. Rather than looking for savings only after cloud resources are deployed, they are embedding value engineering principles earlier in the lifecycle — during architecture, design and provisioning. That shift helps ensure cost, performance, resilience and compliance considerations are addressed together from the outset.

Click the banner below to get finance insights delivered to your inbox weekly.

 

BIZTECH: What KPIs should financial institutions track to measure FinOps success?

STEVENSON: Financial institutions should track a balanced set of FinOps KPIs that measure visibility, accountability, efficiency and business alignment. Cost reduction alone is too narrow a view.

Core KPIs typically include:

  • Cloud spend by business unit, application and product or service
  • Forecast accuracy and budget variance
  • Percentage of spend allocated through tagging or other attribution methods
  • Utilization rates for key cloud resources
  • Coverage and effectiveness of reservation or commitment strategies
  • Idle, orphaned or underutilized resource levels
  • Unit economics, such as cost per transaction, customer, workload or business service
  • Showback and chargeback adoption
  • Time to identify and remediate optimization opportunities

For financial services firms, unit-cost measures are especially important because they connect cloud consumption to business value. Examples might include cost per trade, cost per account serviced, cost per claims transaction or cost per digital payment. The most mature organizations also combine reporting with automation so they can act on these metrics in near real time, not simply review them after the fact.

BIZTECH: Can strong FinOps practices also support resilience, compliance and security goals? How?

STEVENSON: Yes. Strong FinOps practices can directly support resilience, compliance and security by making the cost and value of those decisions more visible and actionable.

In financial services, teams are often required to make trade-offs across service levels, regulatory obligations, performance and cost. FinOps provides a framework for understanding those trade-offs more clearly. For example, firms can quantify the cost of selecting more resilient infrastructure to support customer SLAs, or the cost of additional security controls required for regulated workloads. That helps leaders make more informed decisions upfront rather than absorbing surprises later.

FinOps also improves collaboration across finance, engineering, operations, risk and security teams. By creating a shared view of cloud consumption and accountability, it reduces siloed decision-making and encourages earlier alignment on architecture, controls and policy. In that sense, FinOps is not just a cost discipline; it is an enabler of better enterprise decision-making across efficiency, resilience and governance.

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images
Close

New Research from CDW on Workplace Friction

Learn how IT leaders are working to build a frictionless enterprise.