Security

What Is Asymmetric Information and How Does It Impact IT in Financial Institutions?

Experts say teams operating with incomplete or uneven information are more susceptible to risk, compliance gaps and inefficient decision-making. Here’s why financial IT leaders should care.

Nathan Eddy

Nathan Eddy works as an independent filmmaker and journalist based in Berlin, specializing in architecture, business technology and healthcare IT. He is a graduate of Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism.

The concept of asymmetric information originates in economic theory, describing situations in which one party has more or better information than another. In financial markets, this imbalance has long been associated with risk, inefficiency and poor outcomes.

The same dynamic increasingly applies to the IT environments of financial institutions.

When IT teams, security leaders, compliance officers and executive stakeholders within banks, credit unions, insurance companies or investment firms lack equal visibility into infrastructure, data flows or vendor operations, the result can be misaligned risk models, inefficient technology investments and heightened regulatory exposure.

This imbalance can have far-reaching implications for analytics, artificial intelligence, regulatory compliance and cybersecurity, affecting critical IT domains such as service-level agreements (SLAs), cloud cost governance, technology procurement and data security — all under intense regulatory scrutiny.

What Is Asymmetric Information? Experts Explain

Christopher Gilchrist, a principal analyst at Forrester, describes asymmetric information as a “fundamental issue” that can significantly disrupt enterprise IT, particularly in highly regulated industries.

“This imbalance often occurs between vendors and customers, IT teams and business leaders, or even across internal departments,” he says.

In financial institutions, those gaps may exist between:

IT and compliance teams
Risk management and business units
Cloud providers and internal security leaders

When one side lacks a complete understanding of technical controls, cost structures or data handling practices, organizations can make flawed assumptions that impact resilience and compliance.

“For example, financial IT teams may overpay for services, adopt platforms that don’t meet regulatory requirements or underestimate operational risk because they lack critical insights,” Gilchrist says.

Stephen Elliot, global group vice president for application development and IT operations at IDC, notes that data quality and governance are essential to closing these gaps.

“High levels of business returns will be dictated by the types and amount of customer data used in models that produce consistent and accurate outcomes,” he says.

For banks and insurers, this means effectively leveraging secure data lakes, customer insights and automation — while maintaining strict controls around privacy, data residency and auditability.

By aligning technology investments with core financial processes and regulatory mandates, IT leaders can reduce information asymmetry and improve collaboration between technology, risk and business teams.

Ultimately, addressing asymmetric information helps financial institutions strengthen vendor negotiations, analytics strategies and regulatory readiness.

“Applying customer data effectively is key,” Elliot says. “It’s how organizations unlock advantages while reducing operational and compliance risk.”

Click the banner below to read the 2024 CDW Cybersecurity Research Report.

x_security_q325_animated_click_desktop_01

How Does Asymmetric Information Impact Financial IT Environments?

According to Elliot, asymmetric information can significantly affect SLAs and third-party risk management, particularly when financial institutions lack the tools or transparency needed to verify performance and compliance.

“Each organization must build models they trust and use clean data to build and refresh those models,” he says.

In regulated financial environments, unclear SLAs or opaque metrics can lead to:

Disputes with service providers
Undetected security or availability gaps
Regulatory findings during audits

Addressing information asymmetry is critical to maintaining fairness, efficiency and trust across vendor relationships.

Gilchrist recommends that financial IT leaders prioritize transparency by:

Demanding clear reporting from vendors
Requiring audit-ready documentation
Partnering with trusted third parties to identify blind spots early

“Whether through robust training programs, third-party audits or real-time compliance tools, organizations can bridge these information gaps and make more informed, strategic decisions in an increasingly complex IT environment,” he says.

EXPLORE: What is data poisoning, and how can you protect against it?

What Is the Impact of Asymmetric Information on Cloud Cost Management?

Cloud cost management presents a unique challenge for financial institutions, where complex pricing models intersect with strict governance and risk controls.

Elliot emphasizes that trusted financial models and accurate data are essential.

“Inaccurate data will drive poor cost-based decisions and provide bad cost inputs for workload placement decisions,” he says.

Cloud providers have deep insight into pricing structures, including hidden fees and optimization options such as reserved instances or spot pricing. Financial institutions, however, may lack full visibility into how these models affect:

Long-term operating costs
Data residency and sovereignty
Exit strategies and vendor lock-in risk

“This can lead to overspending on underutilized resources or missed opportunities to optimize workloads,” Elliot says.

In some cases, vendors may downplay the complexity or cost of migrating workloads away from their platforms — a critical concern for banks and insurers required to maintain exit plans and resiliency strategies under regulatory guidance.

DON’T MISS: Find out why data protection is so important to financial services.

How Does Asymmetric Information Impact Technology Purchasing in Financial Institutions?

Siroui Mushegian, CIO at Barracuda, says asymmetric information can significantly affect technology purchasing — especially in cybersecurity.

“Buying should always be a two-way street with vendors and customers,” she says. “Success is often jointly defined.”

For financial institutions facing escalating cyberthreats and regulatory expectations, incomplete vendor disclosures can result in:

Misaligned security capabilities
Hidden costs
Inadequate support for compliance frameworks

“Security leaders must thoroughly understand prospective solutions while prioritizing technologies that deliver comprehensive protection, visibility and scalability,” Mushegian says.

Financial organizations must also clearly understand how sensitive customer and transactional data is collected, stored and processed, particularly when used to train AI or analytics models.

“Without full visibility into how data is processed and secured — whether by a cloud provider or third-party AI platform — organizations risk compliance breaches and legal penalties,” she adds.

Natalia Bodrova / Getty Images