BIZTECH: What are the obstacles that lead to AI initiative failures in the finance sector? How much of the problem is technology, and how much is organizational readiness?
MORRISSEY: In financial services, the barriers are much more organizational than technological. The technology is maturing rapidly, but many institutions still face fundamental challenges with data, process and skills.
Common obstacles include fragmented or poorly governed data, integration challenges with legacy systems, difficulty measuring return on investment and a shortage of AI-specific skills. There is also often a disconnect between AI teams and business stakeholders, which makes it harder to embed solutions into real workflows.
The banks driving impact have the CEO as the chief AI officer. They lead from the top, and I’ve seen incredible collaboration inside the organizations. AI is helping bridge the gap between IT and business teams, fostering stronger collaboration and a more unified focus on delivering impact.
We recently released the 2026 Work Trend Index, which found that a growing share of workers across industries are using AI in advanced, resourceful ways. The problem is that most organizations aren’t keeping up. The constraint for most firms is the gap between what their employees can now do and what their organizations are built to support.
According to the Work Trend Index, organizational factors — things like culture, manager support, talent practices — account for more than two times the AI impact of individual factors like mindset and behavior, at 67% versus 32%. This means the defining question is not whether individuals have the skills but whether the organization has built the culture, management practices and talent systems that incentivize and support new ways of working.
READ MORE: Why does minimum viable data governance make sense for financial services?
BIZTECH: What are the biggest security and privacy concerns when moving AI from sandbox to production in a regulated banking environment?
MORRISSEY: The biggest concerns we consistently hear from financial institutions are around data privacy — ensuring customer information is protected and used in compliance with regulations; model transparency and explainability, particularly for decisions that directly affect customers, such as lending; and the risk of bias or unintended outcomes. There are also broader cybersecurity considerations, since AI systems can expand the attack surface and introduce new vulnerabilities.
This is where having a trusted, enterprise-grade platform becomes essential. With solutions and capabilities embedded across the Microsoft Cloud, institutions can apply consistent controls across identity, data and applications — helping ensure sensitive financial data remains protected while AI systems are operating at scale.
In addition, as organizations begin to leverage more advanced capabilities — such as Agent 365, which can autonomously orchestrate workflows and interact with systems — the need for strong governance becomes even more important. These systems sit closer to business processes and decision-making, so ensuring they operate within defined guardrails, from both a security and compliance standpoint, is critical.
What’s most important is that AI risk management is treated as a core part of the system design. That includes robust access controls, continuous monitoring, auditability and governance frameworks built in from the outset rather than added later. When those elements are in place, financial institutions can move from experimentation to production with confidence, knowing they can scale AI responsibly in even the most regulated environments.
